About CE Online User Guide Search Reports FAQs Working Group Home


How Are Correctional Facilities Responding to the Education Needs of Inmates?

To help inmates acquire skills that enable them be more successful upon release, nearly all states offer educational services ranging from secondary or postsecondary academic instruction to vocational skills training to courses in life skills and cognitive restructuring. To make sound decisions about allocating scarce resources, federal and state policymakers need to know the types of educational services routinely provided to inmates, their intensity, and the extent of inmates’ access to these services. State data can be used to answer policy question such as:

  • Facility Correctional Education Characteristics—a facility’s academic and vocational programs.

    • What types of education courses are provided to inmates?

    • What criteria do facilities use when placing inmates in programs?

    • Do inmates have equal access to educational programs within state and private facilities? Nationwide?

    • Has inmate access to educational services changed over time?

    • How often and for how long are classes offered?

Variables

To respond effectively to policymakers’ questions about the instructional services offered by correctional facilities, states will need to standardize reporting around the following data:

Facility Correctional Education Characteristics

Variable

Reference in Data Codebook

Variable Name

Program Placement Criteria

ABE Placement Assessment Score

ASE Placement Assessment Score

ABESCORE

ASESCORE

ABE Program Intensity

ABE Hours

ABE Days

ABE Weeks

ABEHOUR

ABEDAY

ABEWEEK

ASE Program Intensity

ASE Hours

ASE Days

ASE Weeks

ASEHOUR

ASEDAY

ASEWEEK

VOC Program Intensity

VOC Hours

VOC Days

VOC Weeks

VOCHOUR

VOCDAY

VOCWEEK

LCT Program Intensity

LCT Hours

LCT Days

LCT Weeks

LCTHOUR

LCTDAY

LCTWEEK

PSE Program Intensity

PSE Hours

PSE Days

PSE Weeks

PSEHOUR

PSEDAY

PSEWEEK

Standardizing State Reporting

States currently classify programs using different terminology. To improve reporting, states will need to work together to build consistent definitions for education programs. Current issues that will need to be resolved include:

  1. States do not use the same definitions to classify programs.

    Definitions designating correctional education programs may differ across states, and in some cases within states, so that program titles do not always describe what is taught in the classrooms. For example, in some states, inmate skilled labor may be classified as vocational education, while most states reserve this classification for more traditional occupational training. This can mean that institutions are credited with offering instruction that may not lead to inmates earning a vocational certificate. By working together to clarify terminology, states can help ensure that nationwide estimates accurately reflect the availability of instructional programs.

  2. Program offerings in private facilities are not included in state totals.

    States that house a percentage of their inmates in private facilities may be unable to report detailed information about the education programs offered in these facilities, because program data are not always collected. To ensure that statewide totals accurately reflect the correctional education services provided in all facilities housing inmates under state custody, states should modify their contract agreements with private facilities to require them to collect and provide detailed data on their correctional education programs.